Tris Hussey’s Lifestream

Tris Hussey’s Lifestream

Tris Hussey  //  Writer, photographer, educator, and Internet Rogue. I help people make sense of and manage social media and web 2.0.
Watch for my book Create Your Own Blog in January 2010!

Jan 4 / 10:46pm

A $1000 Apple Tablet will sell more eReaders

While it’s certainly possible that the WSJ decided “about $1,000″ was a good price to quote from analysts, there are at least as many people out there suggesting the device would be more like $600 – $800 — a price that would be much more attractive to consumers. With that in mind, and going along with my little thinking-out-loud-speculation here, I don’t think it’s impossible that Apple could have nudged WSJ towards the $1,000 predictors to temper expectations a bit.

---

And there is a flip-side to all of this: Again, going along with my scenario, maybe Apple pointed towards the $1,000 price to set expectations very low in the weeks leading up to the event. That way, if they announce the device at $800, the public will erupt in applause, overjoyed that it’s not $1,000. Classic under promise, over deliver.

This is of course all just speculation, but I’m not so sure it’s that far out there. Certainly, I wouldn’t put any of the scenarios I laid out past Apple, which has a masterful hand when it comes to manipulating the media.

Okay the WSJ came out with a March ship date and something around a $1000 price tag. Regardless of whatever hemming and hawing is going on now, I'm looking at this news two ways.
One, at that price, chances are I'm not going to get one. Sure I'll drool over them, and wish I had one, but realistically, I'm not going to shuck out that kind of coin for an iTablet.
Two, this is going to sell a lot more "regular" eReaders like from Sony, Amazon, and whoever unveils something in the $200-400 price range at CES.
Which is awesome.
eReaders are just one part of the whole tablet continuum, and the more eBooks out there, the better I think.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  Apple   eReaders   iTablet  

Comments (6)

Jan 2 / 6:58pm

Don't forget, you can't hit a homerun if you don't swing for the fences

It’s Apple, they’re trying to hit a homerun. That doesn’t mean they won’t strike out, but make no mistake that they are swinging for the fences. To create a bland tablet in the image of those that existed before it would be the equivalent of a bunt with no one on and two outs.

With all the discussion about tablet yes, tablet no, let's not forget the basic part--Apple is taking a huge risk with a tablet (if all the rumors are true). But this kind of risk is the only way to hit a homerun.

Similar case in point: Gillette Mach 3. Years and years in testing. Disposable razor market eating their lunch. Gillette swung big, swung hard and ... now how many of you buy a razor with only two measly little blades?

Do or do not, there is no try. -- Yoda.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  apple   innovation   iTablet  

Comments (0)

Jan 1 / 3:37pm

What will an iTablet hath bring?

Successful new gadgets always seem to occupy a clearly defined place alongside, or replacing, existing devices. The Flip filled a previously empty niche for a small, cheap, simple video camera. How was the iPod better than existing portable music players? It fit 1,000 songs in your pocket, with a fun interface that let you find them easily. Why buy an iPhone to replace your existing mobile phone? Because there was a clear need for a modern handheld general-purpose computer.

But how much room is there between an iPhone (or iPod Touch) and a MacBook (or other laptop computer, running Windows or Linux or whatever)? What’s the argument for owning all three?

If Apple is known for anything, it's known for innovation and breaking new ground. So if the pundits have been wrong before about the "what's next" from Apple, what will an Apple Tablet really do?

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  Apple   ereaders   iPad   iTablet  

Comments (0)